My next question is about the burden of proof on the requesting state. We had witnesses here earlier in this study who said that the burden has shifted too far in favour of the requesting state and away from a sense of justice for human rights; but we had another lawyer who said that we have the balance correct, that an extradition hearing is not a trial and that the trial will happen in the other country. We parliamentarians are reviewing our law to see whether it should be amended, and we're looking for some advice from you on that.
How do we find the right balance between being efficient and co-operating with our extradition partners and, on the other hand, ensuring that human rights and justice goals are met?