I do agree with the court's analysis in N.S. I think it's an important decision. On the key parts of the provisions, one of the issues that wasn't considered in N.S., of course, and is considered in the upcoming Canadian Alliance case is whether or not the purchasing law under section 286 is constitutional. The Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the “material benefit” provision and the “advertising” provisions as well. They upheld the purposes. I know that you've been taken to the purposes of PCEPA, which are key to establishing a section 7 argument, if you like, and to find that the three purposes that the court found were the purposes of PCEPA are constitutional. I think it's a very important decision.
On March 1st, 2022. See this statement in context.