Absolutely. Under the tertiary ground, the court must consider the circumstances surrounding the offence, including whether a firearm was used. It signals to the court that the tertiary ground is relevant to the case when there's a firearm being used.
We have a reverse onus at bail, which is quite broad, for any offence when the subject matter involves a firearm, if the person has already been on a prohibition order. As I said before, Parliament has signalled that it ought to be more difficult for someone charged with a firearms offence in that situation to obtain bail. The presumption is reversed. The presumption is that they ought to be detained unless they can prove to the court on the balance of probabilities that they should be released.
There are also a number of conditions that a judge has to consider imposing for offences involving violence or involving a firearm. It's a mandatory prohibition on weapons and their use, if the offence is alleged to involve a firearm. They have to look at imposing conditions that would protect the safety of any victim or witnesses.