Reverse onus departs from the general approach to bail in two respects.
First, there's a presumption that the accused ought to be detained, and second, the accused has to prove, on a balance of probabilities, that they ought to be released having regard to the statutory grounds. They have to prove to the judge that they're not a flight risk, that detention is not justified to protect the public, and that detention is not justified for confidence in the administration of justice.
Those provisions, set out in 515(6) of the code, signal Parliament's intent that it ought to be more difficult to release an accused in those circumstances. We have reverse onuses, as I said, for accused who are alleged to have breached their bail conditions. We have a reverse onus for intimate partner violence, where someone has already been convicted of intimate partner violence, and we have reverse onuses for more serious offences like firearms offences, where they're already on a prohibition order.
I think that's it for the reverse onus.