Yes. They're tied together, though, because what happens today—and it happens almost always in Crown onus offences—is that a prosecutor will say to an accused, with a complete absence of a balance of power, “We will agree to bail on the following terms,” and they will ask for a series of conditions that the accused is asked to agree to in order to be released that day. An accused faces the choice of staying in custody to wait for their bail hearing when they can seek more appropriate or lenient bail conditions, or they can agree to something that's being proposed and offered to them as a “consent”.
When the system is imbalanced, we get bad bail outcomes even on consent matters, because really we don't have true equality of bargaining power in those circumstances.