That's exactly right, because section 515(1)(c) of the Criminal Code specifically mentions the public interest. That interest is going to evolve over time, and that will help the courts remain vigilant.
The problem I raised at the end of my speech is that practical experience tells us that no one checks to make sure that conditions of release are met. Take the curfew, for example: It's all well and good to impose one, but if no one is checking that is being met, in my view, we're failing in our duty to identify delinquents or people facing charges who are undermining the intended effects of pre-trial release.
Earlier, I heard statistics on failure to meet conditions. In my opinion, keeping statistics on failure to meet is really getting it wrong. If you don't meet a condition, you are breaking a condition of release. For example, imagine someone forgetting to inform the court of a change of address. That type of statistic overlaps with many offences that aren't even violent. This can often be a problem for people struggling with social housing issues, among others.