My view is that it would limit the legislation. A humanitarian carve-out prevents different kinds of activities that we want to make sure would be covered, so I think it would be unlikely, but again, that's not my decision. My view is that the shape we've given to the proposal in front of you provides the most flexibility and prevents us from having to come back to this table a few years down the line when the situation evolves to redo the amendment. We want it to be as broad and inclusive as possible, and that's why an exclusive carve-out, to me, speaking entirely personally, isn't the best way forward.
On April 17th, 2023. See this statement in context.