That's what I wanted to know. It was only a rhetorical question, because we talked about it a lot with the minister.
As I understand it, your main objective is to get the bill passed as quickly as possible. We agree with that. That's kind of what I was saying when I addressed the first panel; I believe you were there and you heard me.
In your opinion, is the bill acceptable as it stands now? If the opposition parties and government could not agree, would you prefer to have the bill as it's written today, or are you adamant that it be amended before the House can vote on it?