Okay. That's really important for us to know, because it maybe counters the “rush it through even if it's not perfect” message. It's something we all have to think about.
We've had amendments put forward that involve limiting the scope of this bill to certain geographic areas that would be defined by the government, or limiting it to terrorist entities only and not terrorist organizations in general. This would provide greater certainty for the sector. However, it raises another potential problem, which is that if there is territory that is controlled by a terrorist organization—not an entity—or a territory that is controlled by a terrorist entity that is not listed as part of that listing process, then—as I understand the legislation—you wouldn't be able to apply for an exemption in that case. You would simply be excluded from doing work there. Providing that list could narrow the places for which you could apply for an exemption and therefore prevent you from doing any kind of assistance or support in other areas.
That raises some potential concern for me about those amendments. Do you want to respond to that concern?
Go ahead, Ms. Avis.