Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
It seems as if one of the concerns about general humanitarian exemption is this possibility: You have a terrorist organization controlling an area that says, “You can bring in humanitarian assistance, but you have to pay 70% tax.” You're getting some money to people who are suffering, but most of the money is going to the authority. We probably wouldn't want humanitarian assistance to go in, in that case, because the price is simply too high in terms of who receives it. On the other hand, there are other circumstances in which we think that would be reasonable.
I'd like to hear from those who are in favour of a general humanitarian exemption. What do you think should happen in the hypothetical case I described?