Yes, and I want to mention that I think those names that just came up.... The onus right now is on the organizations to determine if they're listed and by what definition. I think that's problematic, because it's not coming from the government. I think one recommendation is for modifications.
As it stands, each organization would do its own risk assessment on a geographic region on whether there is significant influence or control by a listed terrorist entity. That, in itself, is problematic.
Once they do that, initiating the process and paper work to start negotiating with the government to get that approval would, I think, add a lot of bureaucratic burden, red tape and administrative burden. That's on top of all the other CRA regulations that charities have to comply with in Canada, which is a more cumbersome process than in any of our other partners in the EU or the U.S.