Right. It doesn't permit anything that's currently prohibited. It just narrows the ability of the minister to issue authorizations.
To the point that they shouldn't need authorizations if something should be permitted, that's why we supported the humanitarian exemption. It was because we wanted to say that certain activities shouldn't require authorization; they should just be permitted. If the effect of an amendment is to leave open the question of when it's no longer authorized if it will therefore potentially remain prohibited, that doesn't help the problem. That's the dilemma.