Perhaps I'm incorrect on this, but my understanding is that the authorization would not be required, because, frankly, if it is not substantially controlled by terrorism, the organizations wouldn't be at risk of being charged with this. Otherwise, what you're saying is that we won't have a list and we won't know anywhere, but if there is any terrorist activity at all in a country, then they have to apply for an exemption. However, that's impossible because that's every country that international development works in.
I can't really even think of a country where people are doing development work that doesn't have a terrorist bit to it, however small. Realistically, we wouldn't have to have the authorization, because it is not substantially run by that.
Of course, it limits the minister, but he shouldn't have a role in this anyway. He should be limited.