I'm going to answer in French, if you don't mind.
Proposed paragraph 215(1)(b.1) refers to the duty of the owner or manager “to provide necessaries of life to residents of the facility”. That can be interpreted in two ways. If the owner or manager directly provides care to residents, that person could be charged with neglect if they fail to perform that duty. In the case of an owner or a manager who does not directly provide care to residents, but who is responsible for the actions of their employees, the concept of vicarious liability comes into play. That concept doesn't apply in criminal law. Under the bill, both interpretations are possible.