That's a difficult question to answer, because I think ultimately it will depend on how the courts interpret the duties of the managers or the owners. With the provision you already mentioned, I think it speaks very clearly to the person who has a duty to individuals under their charge.
To the extent that this bill goes beyond that, yes it does, but ultimately it would be for the courts to determine. I think you know as well that oftentimes, with the enactment of more particularized provisions, it can be useful to help remind the system to pay particular attention to an issue of particular concern. Therefore, it has value in that respect as well.