The other contradiction I'm seeing today is between the two people from the Canadian Bar Association. They seem to be presenting radically different approaches to this law.
When we look at what Ms. Grundberg has suggested, in terms of the public places definition, she's actually suggesting expanding those provisions further than those that currently exist. Are these provisions some of the ones you're talking about, where we need to be more precise? My understanding is that they apply around the clock, whether or not children are present, or are likely to be present. The current provisions are actually the ones that drive those who are forced to work on the street into unsafe conditions.
We have one part of the Canadian Bar Association saying those should be expanded. I guess I'm asking.... It doesn't seem as if you're in favour of that.