Let me say, first of all, thank you for your kind words, Mr. Garrison, and thank you to you and your colleague Laurel Collins for the extensive work both of you did in addressing the publication ban piece.
Absolutely, I've heard about those cases, and I think that's why it's important. It dovetails a bit with Mr. Moore's earlier question and the idea of judicial discretion being an important backstop. I found it a bit troubling that the public safety committee study in this Parliament in 2010 suggested that there were two types of discretion at the time—prosecutorial and judicial—and suggested getting rid of prosecutorial, while maintaining judicial.
The government at the time under Stephen Harper decided to get rid of all discretion altogether, and we now see the Supreme Court's response to that decision. Safeguarding the discretion but providing guardrails and criteria that surround it is really important, and one of the guardrails in the legislation is the age and personal characteristics of the victim.
A judge needs to turn their mind to exactly that type of situation to determine whether the presumption should be rebutted and a person should not be added in a given context.