I could try answering you in French, but it would take a long time, so I'll answer in English.
I think that organizing them can be difficult and complicated, and no one has really turned their mind to this option. I also think it's important to recognize that there is a perception that there is a formality to these publication ban orders, which is not reflective of reality; they are very casual.
As Mr. Brock pointed out, people walk into bail court and, as I understand the Crown policy in Ontario, you are supposed to ask for these at the first possible appearance. I don't actually think that's wrong. I think that is erring on the side of protection, but there needs to be information and communication to find out if it needs to stay. When they happen, there tends to be.... There is no formal order. There's no form that gets issued, even when we talk about someone who needs to be mailed the order. If a clerk is organized in court, it gets written on the information or the indictment that there is a publication ban in place.
Otherwise, you might have to go and get the transcript of that day's court proceedings to know whether it has been imposed, which also speaks to the problems with tracking how many of these exist. There isn't really a coordinated approach that deals with it. If we have five victims and these bans all exist, it is complicated if one wants to apply later to revoke it and others don't—