What I'm about to say may actually help you or solve a problem for you, anyway.
Through the machinations of the procedure, which I don't pretend to always understand, PV-9 ended up prior to NDP-1. I agree with the spirit of both amendments, but I have some subamendments to NDP-1. They would not change the essence of it, but I have some language changes that may help.
I raise that now only because the changes were to the wording of NDP-1, not PV-9. Maybe the clerk can help steer me through that problem.