Thank you, Madam Chair.
Ms. May, it's the same problem I laid out earlier, the language used to describe the ban. This refers to the victim being the subject of the order. If it referred instead to the victim's identity, indicating that the publication of the person's name can't be prohibited, that would be acceptable. This, however, concerns prohibiting a publication ban if it goes against the wishes of a witness. I repeat, this cannot apply when a number of victims or witnesses are involved.
The language would need to be more specific. I agree with you that it's necessary to protect the identity of a person who doesn't wish to have their name disclosed, but it's also important to respect the wishes of someone who does want to have their name disclosed.