I've read the criteria; I understand and I very much appreciate the effort to clarify this.
Again, I'm sort of struggling with the concept. I do appreciate that it's not meant to usurp the role of the courts. However, if you're time-barred from appealing to the court of appeal and you didn't appeal because you had no competent legal advice to do so and years later you're well past the time that you could go and apply to the court of appeal for some type of remedy related to insufficient counsellor or whatever else, would it not be a good idea to include some provision in the bill that's irrespective of the above in the event the commission believes, based on certain criteria, that the defendant has no other option and that there are reasonable grounds on which to believe that they were wrongfully convicted—I'm using the wrong words now but I'll take the same language of the bill—and that they should have that opportunity?