I would characterize it much differently, Mr. Caputo. Thank you for the question.
I would say to you that it's not meant to cast aspersions on any member of the Senate or the House of Commons in terms of their ability to chair a committee. When we're considering an appointment as significant as one of the nine members of the Supreme Court of Canada, that is of direct interest to all Canadians, but specifically to members of the legal profession, and having an esteemed member of the legal profession, including a member of legal academia, chair such a meeting is distinctly appropriate, given the tenor and the principal nature of that inquiry.