Thank you, sir.
In relation to different thresholds and what would be applicable, obviously we already have one of our own. You can look at the Criminal Code threshold of “beyond a reasonable doubt” and the civil code threshold of “a balance of probabilities” in civil law and the real possibility that your threshold is lower than the balance of probability, but I would suggest it's higher than what's proposed in this legislation, which is that “a miscarriage of justice may have occurred”.
Could you speak to some cases in general terms of the requirement that's generally applied, in your case, of new evidence? What would that typically look like? I know you're dealing with thousands of cases, but can you give our committee an example of what that could look like?