We get about 30 to 50 applications a year, and we have our criteria that they have to meet. One of those is that they have to have exhausted all of their appeals. That eliminates probably half of them right there.
I think the process is so lengthy anyway. I understand that's still there in the bill, whereas there may be special consideration for certain cases. Perhaps what the witness, Paisana, said earlier may be a way to go about it, having it as an exceptional case that would be allowed to go ahead, despite not having done that yet.