When we are presenting the case to the commissioners, all relevant evidence is presented—all parts of it, the good, the bad and the ugly. It's non-adversarial.
When it goes to the three-judge panel, it becomes adversarial, and the parties get to present what works for them. They may present it in the light most favourable to their client, and it will look a little bit different from what it does before our commissioners.
The state, of course, is represented by the prosecution, who may present things that are unfavourable to the convicted person—and, of course, the convicted person can present all of the things that are favourable to them.