I was just reflecting that, while I don't have the expertise to understand how the dynamics of having a specific number of members would unfold, what we really want to get at is to see the commission's being able to reduce what is, right now, an egregious amount of time to process applications. Those people who can get to a section 696 application right now have no timeline for ministerial review. Also, it can take individuals years to get to an appeal. As I was saying in my comments, many people are discouraged, upon conviction, from appealing. They're told that they don't have the grounds, so they abandon their efforts to appeal. It might take five or 10 years until new evidence surfaces.
What we really want to see is timelines, just legislated systems of accountability, so that however that commission unfolds, it can be measured and augmented over time to be the most responsive it can be.