Thank you for the extra 30 seconds, Madam Chair.
Ms. Campbell, we were talking about time frames when we left off. You were saying that it could take a number of years. I know it works that way, but it still surprises me. We are talking about miscarriages of justice. To my mind, it should be simple.
My fellow member Mr. Maloney asked Ms. Smith whether, at the end of the day, the process amounted to a retrial.
Do you think that's the right way to go? Shouldn't the process be simplified? Again, the commission shouldn't be retrying the case. It should just be checking whether or not a miscarriage of justice occurred. From that standpoint, it's a bit surprising that it takes years to come to a decision about whether a miscarriage of justice occurred.
First, isn't the approach too extensive?
Second, isn't it appropriate to conduct a full-time investigation in order to arrive at a decision and ensure justice is done in a reasonable time frame, so a few months or even weeks?