Thank you.
That makes perfect sense.
I don't expect you to comment on our Canadian context right now. This bill further broadens the application of our wrongful conviction regime to a test that, rather than saying a wrongful conviction “likely occurred” to saying one “may have occurred”, a miscarriage of justice, so we have to be very careful as we draft this legislation.
You mentioned victims in your remarks.
What is the role of the victim in this, and is there a concern about this process revictimizing individuals? Is that a reason to have a narrower focus?