Thank you.
You or somebody from your commission gave evidence at our LaForme and Westmoreland commission looking on miscarriages of justice. I'm quoting here from page 14, I think. This is what they concluded about some of your evidence:
We considered a test that would allow the commission to refer cases back to the courts on “factual innocence” grounds as used in North Carolina. We ultimately rejected such a test on the basis that it was too restrictive.
Here in Canada, we're taking a different direction with this draft legislation. What are your comments about it? Why was this important to North Carolina?