Thank you for the question.
I think when we're looking at defining terms in the Criminal Code, it can be useful, but it's important to consider which person and activities are going to be captured in order to ensure that it doesn't inadvertently exclude certain groups that were intended to be captured by the bill. It's also important to ensure that terms are internally consistent within the code. “First responder” isn't defined elsewhere in the code, so that's not an issue.
I would just say that the wording.... I should say we don't actually have CPC-2. All we have is CPC-1. My understanding is that the definition of first responders is the same. I have that wording in front of me. I don't have the new one.