That's perfect. Thank you.
I guess it's a question of what is intended to be captured by the bill. If the intention is to capture first responders and medical personnel, such as firefighters and paramedics, then it seems like this definition would capture that. There are, of course, other categories of personnel who are in some circumstances considered first responders but may not be captured by this definition, such as correctional officers, probation officers and military personnel.
Also, I think this definition is specific to the provision of medical assistance or firefighting services. For example, in a correctional facility, would a correctional officer who's responding to an emergency that's not a medical emergency be captured by this definition? Possibly not. I guess it's really a question of what's intended to be captured by the bill.