I'm sorry. I lost my train of thought. Imagine that.
Would it be helpful if, on a review for bail, there were questions...? Pardon me. I think where I was going with that is.... One thing I believe the court looks at is the likelihood of success on bail. To be candid, I don't know or recall what that likelihood of success is. I don't think it's a super-high threshold. Is that something we should be considering, especially in the case of a life sentence?
Perhaps, when we deal with clause 3, this informs it. How high is that “reasonable grounds”...to believe there should be bail? I'm not sure whether.... Perhaps the witnesses may say to the committee, “Look, this is actually a higher threshold than...somebody in a court of appeal, who has to satisfy the justice sitting as the bail judge.” I'm not sure if that could do it.
Through the chair, am I making any sense here?