I find it interesting that Mr. Bittle seems to be intent on delaying the proceedings as I endeavour to get to the point that I think is so very relevant to the discussion, because I think what has led to this point is that we have an ability for Canadians to engage on these subjects and in some cases to learn a tremendous amount of information.
I had just mentioned before the interruption that a staff member of mine had been listening to a podcast about wrongful convictions. A podcast led to an outpouring of support and a society-wide, or at least audience-wide, pursuit of justice for somebody who had been wrongfully convicted, and to have the real criminal face the penalties of the crime that had been committed.
I think that bears an important relevance to the conversation, because as lawmakers, we are responsive, whether that be through the electoral process or the correspondence in our daily work. It's that responsiveness that speaks to where we are. There has been a process for the misapplication and miscarriage of justice in this country before. One of the concerns that we shared was that we want to make sure it applies in the right way, and that it doesn't open up or overburden our already-burdened justice system.
Madam Chair, I think that where it fits so carefully and significantly into the process here is that we have the ability for Canadians to be engaged in these subjects in a way that probably has not existed. I would just note, when it comes to the—