I have a point of order, Madam Chair. Mr. Van Popta has the same problem as before. It's not about this section. It's not about clause 2; it's actually about clause 3.
I know I'm being a bit picky here. But since it's going to take us seemingly forever to get through this bill, we could at least try to have the arguments made under the clause that we're actually considering, or saved for the clause that's coming up that they are relevant to.
The question is on whether or not it should be accepted as a miscarriage of justice. That is in clause 3 on page 4 of the bill, and not in clause 2.