No, that's fine. I've actually wondered about this for quite some time.
This wouldn't be a fresh evidence application. It's “the record says” that this person had no intention to kill. They were convicted of murder based on the law in 1981, say, and the law in 2023 would never have convicted them of murder. They potentially would have been convicted for manslaughter.
If that's the case, is there a mechanism by which the person who would have been convicted for manslaughter now, but was convicted for murder then, can go to the court of appeal, or would they need to avail themselves of this type of—