Yes, it's a different professional credential, equally as noble.
My point is that we've all seen laws—Mr. Mendicino was a minister—where we've said one thing and we've seen it interpreted. That's why sometimes we have to work, in my view, with the utmost clarity, because it still says that the application can be accepted.
Do we even want to flood the commission with applications that they have to dismiss? That's a very important point, in my view. Someone could say, “Hey, I can still apply.” They still have to go through the process. I think we should make very clear what our intent is here. If it is historical, we can put a five-year threshold on it. We're catching a lot of convictions there. Let's put something in there saying that if they didn't exhaust their appeal, they're not applying unless a certain amount of time has gone by.
I'm prepared to move that subamendment. I want to hear the rest of the interventions, because I think it's an eminently reasonable subamendment in the circumstances.