I don't think there is a way to cut it off. If an abuser is going to coercively control, they're going to coercively control.
One case that I think is very relevant right now is the case that recently happened in Calgary, where there was emergency protection and a no-contact order in place. It had been breached numerous times and he eventually did kill his partner. I believe that had coercive control legislation been in place, the police would have had another tool in their tool box to hold him accountable for his behaviour, which I think would have changed her safety.
When I think about it, it's not that coercive control is going to end, but if we acknowledge it and there's a tool in the tool box of the justice system to address it, then we can provide better safety for victims of domestic abuse.