This has been defined differently in different jurisdictions. We chose to use the language from the U.K. model, in part because we had some time to look at how it's impacted communities and were able to use some lessons learned from that. I think ensuring that we're looking at patterns of behaviour is vital.
If the committee sees that there is other specific language—for example, if Scotland took a different approach and outlined a more comprehensive list of examples of intimate partner violence—that is an approach you could take. I would argue that we have a good model. We have some of the lessons learned here and it is vital that we move this forward.