Yes. This appears in family law, as you mentioned, but really, this bill is modelled after the U.K. bill. Part of it is defining both how a person is connected and then the impact that coercive control has on the victim. Coercive control has now been criminalized in a number of areas—Scotland, the U.K. and France, and Australia is looking at it—so this is something we've seen around the world.
I think what's important in this definition is how we're defining what is a “significant impact”: causing a reasonable fear of violence more than once, causing a decline in “physical or mental health” or causing “alarm or distress that has a substantial adverse effect” on their daily activities. There is a list of potential ways that could include, but it's not limited to those.