I think it would be helpful to have a non-exhaustive list of certain behaviours so that people in the judicial system can work with something. They will know quickly that they are dealing with cases of coercive control.
Of course, that doesn't prevent us from having guidelines to accompany it. That's what I'm seeing, especially in the U.K. The Home Office has provided guidelines for prosecutors, so there is a list of behaviours that will be encompassed under coercive control. That would make sense, because you can't just have legislation and throw it at police officers, expecting them to know what coercive control is. I'm training them to better understand what it is. That's why I'm suggesting a non-exhaustive list.