Thank you. If you have any examples to submit, that could indeed be helpful to us.
I'll move on to another topic. You'll excuse me for going from soup to nuts, but you'll understand that we don't have much time.
Proposed subsection 264.01(3) reads:
(3) For the purposes of subsection (1), two persons are connected if (b) they are members of the same household, and [...] (ii) are relatives, or [...]
For the purposes of interpreting this provision, should it be made clear that we are talking here about parents of the same child? I'm thinking, for example, of a situation where two roommates each had their own children. Could they find themselves stuck in an awkward situation because of the way this provision is interpreted?
Have you given any thought to this part of the bill?