Thank you, Madam Chair.
I have another question. When I look at amendment G‑2, I see that proposed subsection 264.01(5), which is the last proposed subsection in this amendment, says, “For the purposes of this section, and for greater certainty, a person's safety includes their psychological safety.” I'd like to know what that means.
Personally, I have a number of friends who suffer from anxiety. Nowadays, it seems that many people suffer from anxiety, for reasons I don't know. I have no expertise in analyzing how harmful it is or not. That said, there are people who are anxious for all kinds of reasons, which may be considered invalid by some people, but very valid by others. It's extremely subjective.
When we say that we are also aiming for the psychological safety of individuals, does that mean that each spouse would become responsible for the psychological safety of their partner? I guess that's not what you were getting at. I haven't had time to think about this aspect in more detail. As I was saying earlier, we only read the amendment this morning.
Explain to me how far you wanted to go in terms of psychological safety. What are we aiming for? What will the consequences be if a spouse has psychological problems? Goodness knows that the notion of psychological safety is quite vague and varies from one individual to another, since everyone has different limits.
I would like to hear your explanations.