There is no doubt that determining whether the safety plan meets the standards that are required in issuing orders and determining whether offences have occurred and issuing penalties have aspects of quasi-judicial functions.
What's also important is that, as a lawyer should, I ascertained and verified that we would also have procedural fairness at every step of the way for the parties that are involved, as well as the possibility for judicial review in a court of law after the fact. You get Facebook making a determination. That's reviewed by the new digital safety commissioner. The digital safety commissioner's decision can also then be reviewed in a court of law.
I'm steadfast in my belief that Canadians have confidence in our world-class jurors and in their ability to execute an impartial determination about the veracity and validity of those decisions. That's important for procedural fairness. It's important for confidence in the administration of justice.