There could have been consensus on this. The reason we put forward a motion that invoked the notwithstanding clause, or called on the government to do it, was that we need to protect against judicial activism, as was clearly the case in the initial trial court decisions in Quebec, and then the ultimate decision that came from the Supreme Court.
This is a crucial issue. We are not going to stand for a government that wants to hijack what Canadians care about, hijack the country's agenda to put forward its own attack on civil liberties. That is what this is about. That is why we are introducing this motion and why I have introduced this motion to reset the committee's work.
I seek support from members on this motion, but I realize I've gone a couple of moments over where I was going to with my remarks, so at this time I would move to suspend this meeting.
