I am so sorry to hear of your trials and the pain you must be feeling right now.
Ms. Romaire, your testimony tells us exactly what I think we are hearing.... I am so glad that we're hearing from people on all sides of the spectrum, who wanted MAID, did not want MAID, etc.
I think you are pointing out to this committee—and what we're hearing from you is—that we need to call for clear, distinct practice guidelines nationally, across the country.
Now that is a difficult thing, because the provinces are responsible for practices and patterns of practice, not the federal government. This is a problem. Provinces will decide what they want to decide, and we've seen two different problems, one in Alberta and another in British Columbia.
Thank you. I don't want to ask you any more questions, because you were both pretty clear in your testimony.
I think it is really important that the right people and trained people do MAID assessments, and that the person who is seeking MAID has, as an advocate, a physician who knows their life and what their problems have been and can advocate for that.
Mr. and Mrs. Nichols, it seems that in your case, it did not happen.
Our problem, as a committee, is that we're going to have to look at.... Given that the patterns of practice and practice guidelines are provincial in jurisdiction, it's going to be very difficult for the federal government to have national standards of practice. However, the colleges of psychiatry and physicians may be able to do something about that, because they can be responsible for setting clear guidelines of practice.
I want to tell you how sorry I am to hear of your pain on top of pain, almost adding insult to injury, in both of your cases.
Thank you for testifying, and thank you so much for being so honest and clear with us. I appreciate it.