Thank you, Madam Chair.
What I might offer is to recall what the criminal law does: It exempts the practitioner who administers MAID from criminal responsibility. The criminal law would need to provide a level of certainty and a level of specificity to understand, for the practitioner's purpose, when they are able to proceed.
As I mentioned, part of that involves the practitioner being confident that the request remains the voluntary will of the incapable person who is before them. Part of that goes to the content of the request. Is it clear enough? Is it specific enough? How do we know the request still represents the will? Part of it also goes to looking backwards in time when there may have been very different people and treatment teams involved.
I think it's appropriate to know that this can be an area of shared responsibility. As I mentioned earlier, if provinces were not to legislate in this area or not to provide a framework, for example, to store, track, and maintain advance directives, it would be difficult for the provider at the time of offering MAID to be confident that the document that's before them was in fact made by the person and that it was a voluntary expression of that person's interest, etc.
If there's not a—