Again, I think it is difficult to make rules about a diagnosis. I think we have to look at the individual person. Certainly, ordinary clinical practice would be that you would pursue all the usual standard, accepted treatments for a condition and then some—proposed experimental treatments, innovative treatments, etc.—but an individual may have reasons that they can't take advantage of those treatments. They may not tolerate them. They may not be available. Really, it may be so experimental that it's available in only one centre in the country. It may not really be considered safe for that person in light of their other health circumstances. There are some variables there.
If what you're suggesting is the standard suite of recommended treatments, that's what people ideally would have, absolutely.