Yes. That's correct.
I would also say that the court there ruled that Carter could not be seen as excluding mental illness in the particular case where in a particular interim period they had to rely on the Carter decision, but the court also dealt with the case of conversion disorder.
I would urge people to really look at what that case involved, at a commentary that has been published on conversion disorder, and, I would say, at the red flag that goes up when you look at how this case was decided.
There is a commentary that was written by an expert, Trevor Hurwitz, in the Journal of Ethics in Mental Health, which emphasizes that in this particular case, for example, there was only a chart review to confirm the diagnosis of the lady in question. Trevor Hurwitz, in that article, goes into the details of the complexity of diagnosing such conditions. I would say that the case actually highlights the dangers of allowing fast-track—