I'm not sure any of us did suggest that.
What I'm suggesting is that they're in a position where much of the suffering that their patients are speaking of is not medical in nature, yet under the MAID regime, as long as there is a significant physical disability to which this suffering can, at least in part, be attributed, then the requirements for eligibility are met and it's a legal death. However, that isn't, surely, what this Parliament or the court intended.