Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Professor Froc, the only time that the Supreme Court, in Carter, touched on MAID for psychiatric disorders was in the context of finding that slippery slope concerns and data from other jurisdictions were not relevant because they “would not fall within the parameters suggested in these reasons”—this is at paragraph 111—that they are “the product of a very different medico-legal culture” and that “These cases offer little insight into how a Canadian regime might operate.”
Do I have that right?
